Representative sampling in biomass studies — not so fast!

Peter Thy and Kim H. Esbensen

DOI: 10.1255/tosf.4

Abstract

Proper execution of representative sampling and laboratory mass reduction procedures are critical for the validity and reliability of
chemical analyses of highly heterogeneous biomass fuels. In the study reported by Thy et al.,1 it was demonstrated that faulty sampling
had resulted in apparent ash compositions that differed from the true compositions by factors of two to three for many major oxides.
Analytical results based on non-representative samples may thus not be representative for the specific fuel and processes being
studied. Despite the general acceptance that accurate and representative compositions is a critical prerequisite for understanding
reactions and elemental fractionation, the biomass energy community appears largely to have ignored the critical issues surrounding
representative primary sampling. This can have resulted in misleading or faulty conclusions and may have restricted reliable predictive
modelling.

Published in Issue 1 · November/December 2013

Citing this article

Thy, P. & Esbensen, K. H. (2013). Representative sampling in biomass studies — not so fast. Sampling Science & Technology, November/December 2013(1), 7-10. https://doi.org/10.1255/tosf.4

Copyright

This article is published using the CC BY-SA license. You are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially and free to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

If an article includes an image that was used with permission, or as fair use, the CC license will only apply to the author‘s original content, not that image.