Editorial · Issue 3
Off-Broadway Sampling
The Dutch Not-for-Profit organisation TOXICOWATCH has for ~15 years performed a critical and wide-ranging public duty on a shoestring budget - with remarkable technological, environmental, and societal impact.
For its biomonitoring fieldwork, TOXICOWATCH is developing a very broad range of sampling media (sample types in the TOS parlance) to do environmental assessments. TOXICOWATCH’s new, innovative sampling media are of more than academic interest – indeed quite the contrary. This issue of SST is proud to present the prospects offered by this creative sampling media bonanza to the IPGSA community, an approach far removed from our more traditional sample types: rocks, ore, soil, food, feed, industrial intermediates, and final products. Indeed, we are introduced to the featured topic of SST#3 which the editor has termed ‘Off-Broadway sampling’.
The first two articles in this issue truly live up to this declaration. The first by TOXICOWATCH, which kindly accepted an invitation to feature its important societal work with a focused scope on the bewildering range of sampling media used. This is followed by an even more exotic approach for a purpose so far away from IPGSA’s traditional sampling context so as to defy belief – at first. But it is hoped these clashes with our usual sampling approaches will be inspiring for the IPGSA community.
Two articles follow from the highest echelons re. sampling theory, complementing the featured theme in SST#2, ‘Heterogeneity Testing’.
The debate that was initiated there is enfolding with élan and panache – to be appreciated here in SST#3 as well. This is a front-and-center debate on a [...]
Read the editorial